Talk:Nikah mut'ah
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nikah mut'ah article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 730 days |
Hadith regarding the use of Nikah Mut'ah after Muhammad was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 June 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Nikah mut'ah. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 730 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Sunni position update
[edit]Hi, can we talk more about the prohibition in sunni law about this. For example Ali disagreeing with Ibn Abbas about this topic. It is just odd how the sunni section starts in the 15th century in Mughal India rather than early sunni sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.28.199.31 (talk) 14:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Criticism
[edit]“Nikah mut'ah has been used to cover for child prostitution.”
The source for that is BBC segment done by a group of British Sunnis. It’s like saying Sunni triple talaq divorce is a cover for any prostitution, because one can marry, divorce, his wife remarried, divorces and then rhey are back. All within minutes.
This topic is totally biased anti shia
[edit]To claim repeatedly that a sanctioned practice of millions of shia is akin to prostitution is absolutely horrendous and offensive in Wikipedia 86.254.10.114 (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- I look forward to seeing your improvements. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 20:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes, how exactly an intercouse between two consenting adults is prostitution? Cyborgyan (talk) 13:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 July 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change 'pleasure marriage' to 'pleasure intercourse'. In Arabic 'Nikah' doesn't mean marriage, it means intercourse. Zawaj is marriage, nikah is not. 2A02:A44B:48AB:1:5806:56A5:A5BC:3B8C (talk) 10:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not done. 'Nikah' is plainly translated as marriage under usual circumstances, and no sources have been provided to suggest otherwise. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 July 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
PathToGuidance (talk) 11:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)According to early Twelver tafsir(exegesis) text on verse 4:24 from the Quran,it does not states anywhere about Nikah'Mutah,this is according to twelver book Tafsir'Qummi,volume.1,page.486-487.
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Jamedeus (talk) 04:10, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Unbelievably biased lede section
[edit]First of all, "while this type of marriage is despised as a kind of prostitution among the public and the new generation, the clergy gather together to encourage and even bless it by using concepts related to marriage" has nothing to do with the actual topic in question. There are no offered statistics or any other methodic measurements of this supposed "despise". And the original source is not saying what the paragraph is saying. Second of all, Khomeini's fatwa is irrelevant. In imami fiqh, any mujtahid can give his opinion on a matter of law. There are hundreds of scholars who disagree with Khomeini on this, so why is he quoted and they are not? You cannot emulate a dead mujtahid, so his view on the matter is completely irrelevant to modern practice. These two sections should be removed from the lede. The Khomeini fatwa can be included elsewhere in the article, but definitely not stated like this in the beginning. It's laughably biased, and the extended protection locks it in without any legitimate consensus. شاه عباس (talk) 18:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- All of the problematic sections come from a user named NGC 628 who has been adding biased and borderline Islamophobic contributions endlessly and exclusively since October 2023. The admins are urged to revert those edits immediately, or allow the page to be edited by other members. Locking in a biased user's contribution with no opportunity for alteration is outright bizarre. شاه عباس (talk) 14:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)